### A triangle problem to solve

I have another neat problem for you to solve. This one should be accessible to middle schoolers on up.

This problem is original to John Morse. He is a local mathematics researcher/

author/tutor/computer programmer in Delmar, NY, and has written this problem to help learners use creative and problem-solving skills in various ways. And I think this problem can indeed help in that - it can be solved in many different ways.

[update - solution follows]

I like this problem because there are many ways to solve it and to use it with different grade-level students - such as is already mentioned in the comments.

1) You could use this as a drawing and measuring exercise with 6th or 7th graders who have learned to do compass and ruler constructions.

Once they know how to construct a triangle given its three sides (or see here as well), they can construct these two, then draw & measure the altitudes, and calculate the areas.

Of course the downside is that measurements are bound to be inaccurate, and so they are unlikely to get exactly 12 square units as the area. But then again, you could discuss this topic as well (inaccuracy of measurements).

2) Another way to (clumsily) solve this is to calculate the areas of the two triangles using Heron's formula (if you know it exists!) Just plug the numbers in.

3) The elegant way... accessible to students who know about Pythagorean Theorem. I'll take you through it step by step.

The first step is to NOTICE that the triangles are isosceles ("same-legged"), and to draw a sketch.

(Mine is not a "rough sketch" but as exact as can be done in PhotoImpact, because I started out by drawing the three sides with the given lengths. Then I calculated one angle, and turned one side in that angle to get a "corner".)

In order for the students to easily see the solution, it is fairly important to be able to sketch the two triangles.

When drawing isosceles triangles, think of the capital letter "A" and its two "legs". We just need to draw one that "stands" taller and one that "stands" with its legs wider open.

Notice one of them is close to an equilateral triangle since it's sides are "almost" the same.. 5, 5, and 6. So you would sketch it as almost an equilateral triangle, just make those "legs" to open a little more. Then the 5-5-8 triangle needs to open its "legs" quite wide to make for the wide 8-unit base.

Now, we are concerned about their AREAS, so naturally we need an altitude. Once you draw the two altitudes, the idea is usually to find how many units long the altitudes are, so you could

But in this case, there's sort of a shortcut. You will realize (or remember) that the altitude forms two little RIGHT triangles in each triangle.

In the triangle on the left, the two known side lengths of the little triangle are 5 and 3, and in the other the two known lengths are 5 and 4.

This would HOPEFULLY ring a bell.... DING! REMEMBER the 3-4-5 right triangle? Would it fit here?

Oh yes, it does. In

To prove it, you CAN use the Pythagorean theorem: in one little triangle, you'd have x, 4, and 5 (5 being the hypotenuse), so solving x

But there's no need to go through the solving if you remember that 3-4-5 is a right triangle.

OK, now we know the altitudes and could calculate the areas... BUT wait! If the little triangles are identical (congruent), then their areas are the same, and the areas of the large triangles are the same as well. We only need to find the

So with two triangles with the same area, the ratio is of course 1:1.

The sides of triangles A and B measure 5, 5, 8 and 5, 5, 6 respectively. What is the ratio of the area of triangle A to that of triangle B? Express in simplest a:b form.

This problem is original to John Morse. He is a local mathematics researcher/

author/tutor/computer programmer in Delmar, NY, and has written this problem to help learners use creative and problem-solving skills in various ways. And I think this problem can indeed help in that - it can be solved in many different ways.

[update - solution follows]

I like this problem because there are many ways to solve it and to use it with different grade-level students - such as is already mentioned in the comments.

1) You could use this as a drawing and measuring exercise with 6th or 7th graders who have learned to do compass and ruler constructions.

Once they know how to construct a triangle given its three sides (or see here as well), they can construct these two, then draw & measure the altitudes, and calculate the areas.

Of course the downside is that measurements are bound to be inaccurate, and so they are unlikely to get exactly 12 square units as the area. But then again, you could discuss this topic as well (inaccuracy of measurements).

2) Another way to (clumsily) solve this is to calculate the areas of the two triangles using Heron's formula (if you know it exists!) Just plug the numbers in.

3) The elegant way... accessible to students who know about Pythagorean Theorem. I'll take you through it step by step.

The first step is to NOTICE that the triangles are isosceles ("same-legged"), and to draw a sketch.

(Mine is not a "rough sketch" but as exact as can be done in PhotoImpact, because I started out by drawing the three sides with the given lengths. Then I calculated one angle, and turned one side in that angle to get a "corner".)

In order for the students to easily see the solution, it is fairly important to be able to sketch the two triangles.

When drawing isosceles triangles, think of the capital letter "A" and its two "legs". We just need to draw one that "stands" taller and one that "stands" with its legs wider open.

Notice one of them is close to an equilateral triangle since it's sides are "almost" the same.. 5, 5, and 6. So you would sketch it as almost an equilateral triangle, just make those "legs" to open a little more. Then the 5-5-8 triangle needs to open its "legs" quite wide to make for the wide 8-unit base.

Now, we are concerned about their AREAS, so naturally we need an altitude. Once you draw the two altitudes, the idea is usually to find how many units long the altitudes are, so you could

*calculate*the area.But in this case, there's sort of a shortcut. You will realize (or remember) that the altitude forms two little RIGHT triangles in each triangle.

In the triangle on the left, the two known side lengths of the little triangle are 5 and 3, and in the other the two known lengths are 5 and 4.

This would HOPEFULLY ring a bell.... DING! REMEMBER the 3-4-5 right triangle? Would it fit here?

Oh yes, it does. In

**BOTH**triangles, the little triangles are 3-4-5 right triangles!To prove it, you CAN use the Pythagorean theorem: in one little triangle, you'd have x, 4, and 5 (5 being the hypotenuse), so solving x

^{2}+ 4^{2}= 5^{2}gives you x = 3, and in the other triangle, solving x^{2}+ 3^{2}= 5^{2}gives you x = 4.But there's no need to go through the solving if you remember that 3-4-5 is a right triangle.

OK, now we know the altitudes and could calculate the areas... BUT wait! If the little triangles are identical (congruent), then their areas are the same, and the areas of the large triangles are the same as well. We only need to find the

*ratio*of the two areas, not the actual areas.So with two triangles with the same area, the ratio is of course 1:1.